Monday, June 29, 2015

Why has the Palm County Sheriff office NOT arrested Robert Spallina and Donald Tescher? Why is Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office protecting Robert Spallina and Donald Tescher even in the face of admitted crimes. Has the PBSO Office been paid off or threatened? Has Andrew Panzer personally been paid off or threatened? Are these admitted crimes legal in Palm Beach County ? With detectives like Andrew Panzer it is easy to see where there is so much probate crime in Palm Beach County Florida.

The Simon Bernstein Estate Case and the Shirley Bernstein Estate Case out of Boca Raton Florida is still going on, three years later. Judges are not ruling per law, Detectives are looking the other way and high finance crimes are RAMPANT.

Below is an email yet AGAIN from Eliot Bernstein to Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office, Detective Andrew Panzer, who seems to have no interest in protecting the victims of crimes in Palm Beach county Florida.

"From: Eliot Ivan Bernstein []
Sent: Monday, June 29, 2015 5:58 AM
To: Detective Andrew Panzer @ Palm Beach County Sheriff (; Captain Carol Gregg @ Palm Beach County Sheriff (


Detective Panzer,

After our last several calls it is apparent that the PBSO investigations into the Bernstein case matters has been derailed, stymied and delayed and that instead of investigating these ongoing crimes you have begun doing research on my federal RICO filed and who I copy on emails to you as if this were more important than the crimes reported to your agency.

I am not sure why it matters to you at all why I copied Judge Scheindlin on these matters, especially where there are growing correlations between these new crimes committed to my prior RICO filed and those defendants.

First off, in our last conversation we started with the fact that I am trying to report new crimes to you and simultaneously have some of the older crimes reported investigated that have been ongoing for several years.

I wanted to know why some of the crimes you have absolute admission of were not yet prosecuted, especially where there is admission by Attorney Robert Spallina, Esq. that he and his partner Donald Tescher, Esq. conspired to alter estate documents and then Spallina actually altered the document as admitted to PBSO and transmitted via mail and wire them as part of an elaborate fraud to various parties.

This crime had serious ramifications to beneficiaries of the estate and has cost beneficiaries a loss of monies and further damaged the parties causing almost two years where beneficiaries remain disputed due to the crimes that have failed to be prosecuted.

Your claim that since Spallina and Tescher did not send the fraudulent documents to the court made the crime appear not prosecutable is almost unbelievable as you are certainly aware fraud does not have to take place upon a court to be fraud and prosecutable.

Spallina’s confession to the crime came happened on or about January 2014 and still no arrest has been made since the prior detectives learned of the crime and were then suddenly replaced by you.

Further, Robert Spallina and Donald Tescher both profited from the crimes despite what they may have claimed and other parties are severely economically damaged from the crime as a result.

When I mentioned that I would like to have them arrested you stated that it was not up to me to have them arrested, it was up to you and where I think it is actually up to the State Attorney to determine that and the crime should have been reported to them to determine if prosecution was right.  You stated you were not sure what Detective Miller had done prior and thought he might have dismissed arresting them at the time but for unknown reasons.

I also informed you that Spallina and Moran had perjured their statements and stated initially that the six Moran documents that were forged and fraudulently notarized for six separate parties, including Post Mortem for my deceased father, were the only documents they were aware of and yet with Spallina’s confession to PBSO that he had altered a Shirley Trust document in January 2013 to alter beneficiaries as part of a continued fraud, we now know those statements were false and he knew all along of other fraud that he committed in conspire with Tescher.

This would lead one to believe that Moran should be further prosecuted and investigated regarding her crimes and further prosecuted not only for the crimes she was not charged with initially, like forgery she admitted and any plea she made be stricken as she perjured statements to the Governor Rick Scott’s notary division that contradicted her statements to PBSO.  Spallina made misrepresentations to PBSO during his initial interview regarding the Moran/Tescher & Spallina PA crimes.

I informed you that some of the new crimes may now involve investigating Judge Martin Colin for possible obstruction of justice and where he is a material and fact witness to several crimes (frauds upon the court) that occurred in his court and must now be investigated as to those crimes that appear to have never been investigated since 9/13/2013 when they were first discovered.

You stated you were aware of Colin’s recent “recusal” but you should be aware that he was initially requested to disqualify and void ALL of his orders by me and Judge Colin denied the disqualification motion and instead the very next day he recused himself instead.

This appears an attempt to not have his orders voided due to the proven and admitted frauds upon his court, including crimes beyond the Moran forgeries and notary frauds that all still remain unprosecuted or investigated by PBSO.

Judge Colin after recusing then proceeded to influence the transfer of the cases to a former Proskauer Rose law firm partner, Judge Coates and if you recall I am pursuing Proskauer for theft of my intellectual properties and their alleged involvement in the crimes of the Estates and Trusts of my parents (see attached Supreme Court of Florida Writ.)

In fact, while my RICO was dismissed as you astutely noted I am still pursuing Proskauer and others involved in the patent thefts and my patents remain suspended and new information as I stated is leading to a petition to reopen not only my RICO but other actions (including a Florida Court Case that was before Judge Jorge Labarga) and all of the matters before you will be included as additional criminal acts that have occurred relating all this together.

You should know that Judge Coates then recused himself Sua Sponte at the first hearing due to his conflicts, yet the transfer and acceptance of the court records to him by Colin may prove to be additional criminal acts.

You again stated in our conversation two weeks ago that you were specifically only targeting your investigation to the Oppenheimer trusts for the minor children and that you did not have time or resources to investigate other crimes.

When you spoke to my wife Candice you told her that you do not investigate crimes committed by Judges and I am unclear why as the Judicial Qualifications Commission and Florida Bar have no jurisdictional powers to investigate criminal statute violations of judges or anyone else.

When I asked you two weeks ago if I needed to speak again to Captain Carol Gregg to have the other crimes you stated you could not investigate investigated by someone else and resources allocated you became upset and told me that I would be violating the “chain of command” if I did that and I asked if I should go to Internal Affairs, at which time you became more disgruntled and told me even if I went to them it would not do me any good that it would only be sent back to you.

To be clear I have already had to go to internal affairs and Captain Gregg regarding the earlier attempts to shut down the investigations without full and formal procedural due process given them due to the interference of Judge Colin with the prior detectives in efforts to have the cases shut down prematurely and let Judge Colin handle the criminal statute violations, which I stated he could not do and was right, leading to the investigations continuing and leading to the Spallina confession and more.

I fear that this influence by Judge Colin may still be interfering with these investigations, especially where PBSO does not think they can investigate criminal acts alleged against judges.  When Detectives Miller and Groover were replaced by you we had not finalized anything with them other than the Kimberly Moran arrest, which as I stated will also possibly have to be re-examined because it appears that statements made by her and Spallina and others to authorities may have been false and misleading leading to her light sentence and her evasion of prosecution for multiple counts of forgery and fraudulent notarizations that were failed to be prosecuted at that time based on perjured and false statements of both her and Spallina to PBSO.

In fact, on March 26, 2015, Judge Colin in the second to last hearing he held stated,

THE COURT: I'm not -- look, nothing is easy
18 here. It's not going to get easier until we can
19 get hearings where I can start to knock off some
20 of the issues, which is what I have been saying
21 now like a broken record.
22 At some point, either Eliot is going to be
23 sustained on his positions or he's going to be
24 overruled, but one way or the other, we can put
25 some of this stuff to rest. The problem is we're
1 doing all of this business with some of the metes [matters]
2 of the case still up in the air where I haven't
3 been able to adjudicate; the claims that Ted
4 should be removed; the claims that there's
5 wrongdoing beyond Spallina and Tescher, the trust
6 is not valid. I mean, give me a chance to rule on
7 that, because once I rule on that, then the matter
8 is over with on those and you'll know one way or
9 the other what to do.
10 Do you understand what I'm saying? I think
11 we have hearing time coming up. Let's use that,
12 you know, prioritize hearings on this case. So as
13 soon as we can, I'll give it to you.

Where Judge Colin is referring to the wrong doings going beyond Tescher and Spallina he is apparently referring to the alleged crimes we thought were being investigated by your offices but appear not to be according to you.

As for his statements regarding if the trusts are valid and other documents were fraudulent, again this is all part of the ongoing investigation that you inherited from Miller and Groover but now claim you are not going back to the crimes they were investigating at this time and instead focusing your investigation on the Oppenheimer crimes, which is not what we understood when you came on board, as we were told you were taking over the whole case and all the matters they were investigating, as well as, any new crimes discovered, especially those discovered when Spallina and Tescher were forced to turn over their records by court order and many new crimes were discovered.  Now all this seems to have fallen through the cracks and you appear to evade investigating them without reason for over a year now.

In December of 2014 my wife Candice and I met with you and provided you with information that there were trusts for our children that had severe problems with them indicating further fraud and gave you witnesses to contact regarding the alleged crimes.

You stated you would get right on it and it is now six months later and you have failed to even begin or according to our last conversation just began.  You claimed in our conversation several months ago that you could not meet Traci Kratish because it was tax season and I am unsure how six months has qualified as tax season.

I was shocked to learn in our conversation two weeks ago that Traci had come to see you several weeks ago and you put her off stating you working on getting documents from others that would be more complete and failed to take her statements, as she is at risk, like others, who are trying to have these crimes exposed and prosecuted.  In our last conversation you stated you finally had contacted Traci and her lawyer and this is almost seven months after I initially reported that crime.

What is equally disturbing is that when you stated in December you were going to focus on the Oppenheimer crimes you stated you would get back to me in a few weeks to intake all the new crimes that we had discovered and it has been seven months and I am still unable to have you intake those crimes and begin investigations regarding all of them as of this week.  The attached letter to you dated January 13, 2015 has additional information regarding the status of the matters we discussed.

I then contacted you on or about the week of March 23, 2015 to invite you to attend a court ordered re-inventorying of properties that I have alleged stolen taking place on March 27, 2015 at my father’s home in regard to complaint 13159967 filed with PBSO regarding theft of properties by Spallina, Tescher, Ted, Rose and others.

I explained that we had discovered that even more items were missing and that Judge Colin was forced to order a RE-inventorying regarding items that were told to the court to be at my father’s home and which were alleged by Mr. Stansbury and myself to not be there.

I invited you to the home to take part in the re-inventorying to determine if further theft had occurred and you refused to go or send an officer to the scene to determine if items had been stolen.  It now appears that all of the items that were told to the court to have been transferred to the home from my mother’s condominium were stolen and Mr. Rose’s statements to the court were false and misleading and again this is matter for criminal investigation as yet another fraud on the court and as grand theft but again you tried to dodge the issue and told me again that I would have to go to the Boca Raton PD to report this as it was out of your jurisdiction.

You may have forgotten that you told me to go to Boca PD several months ago when I first reported the matter to you and I went to the Boca PD and they asked why your agency was not investigating and stated that I had to go back to PBSO and have you investigate the matter.

They stated they had contacted PBSO and it was in your jurisdiction and if you wanted their involvement you could call them and explain.  Again, months have passed and again the other week you tried to again defer the matters to Boca PD claiming you do not have jurisdiction and even claimed you were not aware of the theft claims despite there being a formal filed complaint with PBSO that you have been aware of since we met and that was directed to be filed by Detectives Miller and Groover initially.

I contacted you again on or about April 13, 2015 and informed you that I had been contacted by my attorney at law, Candice Schwager, Esq. of Texas and she had warned my family that we were in imminent danger and to contact state and federal authorities to seek protection.

Again, you did not even contact me back to find out what was going on or take a statement and this is where I began to draw a line regarding your failed investigations into all of these matters, starting with the PBSO report Case #12121312 filed on the day my father died that my brother Ted instigated that alleged that my father may have been murdered by poisoning and the fact that it was booked by PBSO as a hospital record check, which despite being told several times that PBSO was changing the case docketing, this still has not been rectified and corrected as promised and where the person accused was never even questioned by PBSO.

I have also stated that there may be new information from the coroner and other information that may cause this case to not only be corrected in how it was booked but reopened as a possible murder and as of this date you have refused to take that information as well or deal with it.

In fact, when I brought that up you made comments that my dad was old and going to die anyway and probably ate too much high fat chicken soup being Jewish and these comments were beyond offensive and heartless.

I lost great respect for you upon hearing those claims, you even stated that he had 90+ percent blockage in two arteries, as if you were a medical examiner and where those arteries were bypassed many years ago and irrelevant.

I told you that the Doctor in charge of my father at the hospital on the day he died emphatically told us the night he died that his heart was fine and he did not have a heart attack that day at all and thought it was an infectious disease that was causing his body to rapidly melt down and it may have been West Nile or some unknown disease.  

I further told you my father had been seen within the year before his death one of the leading heart surgeons in New York who had worked on former President Bill Clinton and that he had a clean bill of health regarding his heart, in fact the Dr. told him it looked good for another 10+ years.

You stated in our last two conversation that you thought that all of these matters should be investigated by Federal Agents and then offered me a good luck getting someone federally to investigate the matters and I wondered why if you thought all along as you said that this was for federal authorities you have not contacted them and turned the matters over to them yourself for investigation.

As you are aware, when we first met, we talked about the insurance matters involving Spallina, Tescher, Ted and Alan Rose and others that involve allegations of interstate mail and wire fraud, insurance fraud, fraud on a federal court and more, both you and Detective Miller were going to contact federal agents and get us a name to contact and/or get them involved.

The Oppenheimer crimes alleged similarly have interstate mail and wire fraud as well as fraud against my children charged and this too may be better suited for Federal investigators as discussed.  Keep in mind that the insurance fraud alleged to have been committed by Spallina and reported to PBSO was originally delayed after PBSO investigators, including you, told us you did not have jurisdiction to investigate that matter and sent us to the Jacksonville Illinois PD department to investigate the insurance fraud as the fraudulent document was sent by Tescher and Spallina to an insurance company in IL.

Where the Jacksonville PD were then astonished that PBSO had referred me to call them while you had an active investigation going into these same matters and were further confused why your offices did not contact them directly if you thought they needed to be called.

Again, I feel that your team has stymied and delayed investigation with intent and still have failed to contact federal authorities on matters that you were initially involved in regarding the same nexus of events that you know are federal in nature.

In fact, what PBSO has done is try and isolate crimes as if they were unrelated, force repeated reporting to other agencies of several of the crimes to evade investigating them and where all those agencies wonder why you are having me do this and then they are turning me back to PBSO for investigation and yet the matters still are refused investigation by you.

As I stated last week when we spoke I do not think you should proceed any further in these matters until I speak with Captain Gregg and possibly Internal Affairs as I feel you are trying to improperly influence and close the matters before investigating fully all the matters before you.  I have attached the letter I previously sent regarding my problems with your investigation and I just do not think since January anything has really changed and all the while crimes continue to be committed and wholly ignored further endangering my family.

Also, if you can please reply if PBSO has contacted the Florida Bar, the Judicial Qualifications Commission, Chief Justice Jorge Labarga, Judge Martin Colin or Judge David French regarding any of the matters we have brought for investigation and if so when and with whom.  Please make this letter and all attachments part of the record of my cases filed.

Thank you,

Eliot I. Bernstein
Iviewit Holdings, Inc. "

Click Below to Download January 13th, 2015 Letter from Eliot Bernstein to Detective Andrew Panzer of the Palm County Sheriff Office.

Below is the Florida Supreme Court Filing regarding the above allegations and Florida Estate Cases

Tuesday, June 16, 2015

Angela Broderick of the Hungry Bookworm Loughrea. Is Angela Broderick a Scammer? Has Angela Broderick of the Hungry Bookworm scammed money out of you for any reason?

Angela Broderick of the Hungry Bookworm Loughrea ~ Any Stories of Empty Promises or Lies ? eMail them to me for posting on my public blogs about Angela Broderick Loughrea and her actions that cause harm to others in any way.

Do you have a story of Angela Broderick of the Hungry Bookworm Loughrea owing you money, lying to you or deceiving you in any way?

LIES ~ Deceit ~ Money Scams
If so please email me your story to for my blogs reporting on Angela Broderick of the Hungry Bookworm Loughrea, as this is a VERY important public issue.

My Goal is to protect the public at large and STOP Angela Broderick of the Hungry Bookworm Loughrea  from Creating any more VICTIMS of her lies, deceit and bad debt.

If you have any information regarding any financial issues, taxes, injury or workers compensation, PAYE claims, debts owed, lies or promises or any other information that shows that Angela Broderick of the Hungry Bookworm Loughrea  has caused you or someone you know harm in any way.  eMail me at  

Sunday, June 7, 2015

Ed Magedson of the Rip Off Report Removed Rip Off Report speaking critical of First Amendment Attorney Marc Randazza and his law firm Randazza Legal Group.

The First Amendment is Alive and Well; accept when it comes to those who speak critical of First Amendment Attorney Marc Randazza or his law firm Randazza Legal Group.

I, Crystal Cox posted a Rip Off Report about Marc Randazza and Randazza Legal Group in January of 2014.  Marc Randazza was, at that time, involved in a case where he was supporting / representing Opinion Corporation and their online gripe site Marc Randazza, as usual, was boldly out there pretending to protect the First Amendment Rights of all to post on that site.

After I posted my Rip Off Report griping about / reviewing my former attorney Marc Randazza and his law firm Randazza Legal Group, the owner of Rip Off Report, Ed Magedson, emailed me and asked me to call him to discuss it. I called Ed Magedson of the Rip Off Report, and I confirmed it was me, it was my story and he let the post go up; that was January of 2014.

The Randazza Legal Groupies, as I like to call the gang of attorneys and bloggers that side with First Amendment attorney Marc Randazza no matter if he is ethical or legal, constitutional or unconstitutional, well they "act" as if Free Speech on the Internet is the most important thing.

They "act" as if they are for "ALL speech" and not some speech. They say ya gotta love all speech and they tout their First Amendment Rights as a badge of honor in which they will do anything to protect.

Yet they have never been for the free speech rights of Blogger Crystal Cox, Inventor Eliot Bernstein, Whistle blower Alexandra Mayers or Human Trafficking Victim / Investigative Blogger Diana Grandmason. In fact, they have sued us, threatened us, had us followed, bullied us and put us on under massive duress and attack for years. And all because they did not like our FREE SPEECH.

The Randazza Legal Groupies do not speak up when their lying leader, Marc Randazza, uses Trademark Law, Copyrights, the Lanham Act, Defamation Laws, and more, to silence his critics. They simply put their head in the sand and ignore what Marc Randazza is CLEARLY doing to HURT the Free Speech RIGHTS of all on the internet.

Still today you see the Randazza Legal Groupies paint me, Crystal Cox, out to be a criminal, a felony extortionist, an infant attacker and more. Yet the truth continues to reign free to anyone who actually reads into the documents facts of any of it.

Ed Magedson of the Rip Off Report charges around $2500 to start, Right? In order to arbitrate between the person who feels their were a victim and the person or company they post on.

Here is more on the Corporate Advocacy Program at Rip Off Report (not to be confused with EXTORTION of course)

Ed Magedson of the Rip Off Report makes ALOT of money. I, Crystal Cox, am currently penniless and homeless due to the Randazza Legal Groupies. Yet Ed Magedson of the Rip Off Report is not an extortionist in any way right? And the Randazza Legal Groupies claim that Crystal Cox is? WOW.

Ed Magedson of the Rip Off Report is somewhat infamous for never taking down posts. We, as consumers, who have made amends with those we griped about do not have the right to edit or retract our own posts / Rip Off Reports.

Innocent people, companies, churches, pastors, lawyers, and more really are harmed every day by false Rip Off Reports, malicious Rip Off Reports. Yet they, we, are "not allowed" to edit or remove, even our own post, no matter how much they / we plead with Ed Magedson or provide proof of what is said being clearly false and defamatory.

Ed Magedson of the Rip Off Report claims to never remove anything and to be for the First Amendment Rights of all. Yet he took, flat out hijacked, my, top of the search engine Rip Off Report speaking critical of Marc Randazza and Randazza Legal Group and used it to harass and defame me, and claimed I abused the site.

Instead of deleting the post / Rip Off Report I posted, or allowing me to retract or edit it, Ed Magedson of the Rip Off Report simply hijacked my report to suit his own agenda. And used it AGAINST ME, the original poster. This was in complete discrimination and NOT a standard of practice of the Rip Off Report.

Sidenote:  Anyone with balls enough to SUE Ed Magedson of the Rip Off Report and wants to represent me Pro Bone, email me at

So, the question becomes why?

Well to me it is clear that Marc Randazza, Ken White, and the Randazza Legal Groupies threatened Ed Magedson of the Rip Off Report somehow. Was it a lawsuit against him? Do they have something on him? Would they start an online war and harassment campaign against him as they did me? What threat did they make? And why did / does Ed Magedson of the Rip Off Report not report them to the Bar, to the Attorney General, the Department of Justice?

Does Ed Magedson of the Rip Off Report fear that the Randazza Legal Groupies will harm him in some way? If so How? Who got to Ed? Well I would say Marc Randazza and I would say it is illegal, unconstitutional and clearly unethical.

Marc Randazza did not only try and silence a critic, suppress speech, shut down the flow of information and use copyright and trademark law to shut down sites that spoke critical of him, but he succeeded. Marc Randazza consistently shuts my blogs down, has my Rip Off Report Changed, gets my YouTube Videos and Facebook pages shut down, and yet is still speaking out as if he is FOR the Free Speech Rights of ALL. Which CLEARLY he is NOT.

Below is a part of a Timeline I have included in my Nevada Bar Complaint and Attorney General Complaint Filing that is Pending. This shows dates and actions of Ed Magedson of the Rip Off Report in regard to my Rip Off Report griping about / reviewing my former attorney Marc Randazza and his law firm Randazza Legal Group. Which I claim is aiding and abetting, and clear proof of pattern and history and will be part of a RICO Legal Action at some point. (Stay Tuned)

Chronology of Events

On January 3rd 2014, I, Crystal Cox posted a Rip Off Report regarding my experience with Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group.

I got this eMail right away

Real Name:
Crystal Cox
Display Name:

Dear Crystal,

Did you make this posting? if so, can you give us a call?

NO, we were not even contacted by the attorney. We are contacting you because we think the posting might be suspicious. We don’t know him  nor have we ever spoken with him at our office.

You can respond to me by email and or ..
You can call me directly at xxx and say who you are..
If it goes into voicemail, just try back in 5 minutes.

Let me know you are the one that posted the Report to the 1st Amendment Attorney Marc Randazza and that you stand by your Report.

This is the Report I am referring to.

ED Magedson - Founder ''

I immediately called and stated that it was my report and that I fully stand by what I said.

Ed Magedson is well known for NOT removing Rip Off Reports, he offers a service costing thousands for people to negotiate the removal of a report. He has been to court many times allegedly and has stood by the NOT removing anything policy.  The Rip Off Reports are consistent and when someone files, their initial grievance remains on top and their title to the report remains the same.

After we hung up, Ed Magedson of the Rip Off Report, went ahead and filed the Report.

Approximately February 1, 2014,  Kenneth P. White of and the law firm White, Brown and Newhouse of California, associate and friend of Marc Randazza, posted a defamatory, false rebuttal on Crystal Cox’s Rip Off Report reviewing her ex-attorney Marc Randazza and his Law Firm Randazza Legal Group.

Ed Magedon of the Rip Off Report highlighted this rebuttal like NO OTHER REBUTTAL on his entire site. He put this on TOP "Update: Must-read blog post about the First Amendment'' and put a Notice to it in the headlines. He leaned the report toward reading the Rebuttal of Kenneth White defaming Crystal Cox and discrediting what Crystal Cox had posted in her original report.

Clearly Ed Magedson of the Rip Off Report was favoring Randazza and joining in the retaliation of Marc Randazza's former client Crystal Cox.

The record clearly shows that Marc Randazza did not believe he was being extorted and in fact, stated that he knew his former client Crystal Cox was asking for a Job. See Exhibit 17 

As the Record Clearly Shows, Marc Randazza SWORE to Federal courts and engaged in a widespread defamatory campaign against his former client, Crystal Cox and inventor Eliot Bernstein.

Marc Randazza maliciously claimed we had somehow extorted him, when the record, clearly and convincingly, PROVES that Marc Randazza, himself, KNEW he was not being extorted.

Therefore Marc Randazza maliciously, with actual malice and with full knowledge of it's falsehood, told the courts and WIPO in sworn documents and told media worldwide that Crystal Cox and Eliot Bernstein had extorted him, knowing that it was NOT TRUE.

Kenneth White, as seen in the TOP of Crystal Cox's Rip Off Report, took a private email from Crystal Cox to her former attorney and painted Crystal Cox in false light as if that was the only email and not the entire thread and as if Randazza really believed Cox was extorting him, which he clearly did not, as Exhibit 17 shows.

Exhibit 22, is a blog post from attorney (Randazza Legal Groupie) Ken White's blog,, as seen posted on the TOP of Crystal Cox's Rip Off Report reviewing her former attorney.

Exhibit 22 proves that these attorneys acted together to destroy Crystal Cox's intellectual property, online reputation, to paint her in false light and deliberately, willfully and wantonly ruin her life, with total disregard for the law and for their duty and obligations to society as attorneys. And with full knowledge that what they were posting was false.

Exhibit 22 proves that these attorneys were targeting Crystal Cox's domain names, prying into her private information and launching an attack. All based on the third party false and defamatory statements made by Crystal Cox's vengeful former attorney, Marc Randazza.

Exhibit 22 shows that Randazza sued  Crystal Cox and Eliot Bernstein to create a pattern and history to attempt to set up his former client Cox, of which he owed client attorney duties to and to set up Inventor Eliot Bernstein.  They were creating a false "pattern and history" using privileged emails to attorneys that were not extortion, not adjudicated fact, not permissible by the rules of evidence as a matter of law and should not have been posted online, period, as a matter of law.

On April 30th, 2015, Ed Magedson of the Rip Off Report changed Crystal Cox's Rip Off Report griping about and reviewing her former attorney Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group. 

The Report had been in the top ten of the Google search results for over a year. Marc Randazza, Cox alleges, wanted to change the search and so he had Ed Magedon of the Rip Off Report manipulate Crystal Cox's Rip Off Report to help First Amendment attorney Marc Randazza "save face".  Crystal Cox alleges this to be discriminatory and aiding and abetting the cover up of information.

Not only this, Ed Magedon of the Rip Off Report used Crystal Cox's Rip Off Report and 1.5 years of search engine ranking and links to deliberately, intentionally paint Crystal Cox in false light and to flat out lie about Crystal Cox.

Instead of the Rip Off Report Reading; Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group, the Title of Crystal Cox's Report about her former attorney Marc Randazza, Ed Magedson of Rip Off Report changed the title to:   "Crystal Cox lost case in 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, “Cox apparently has a history of making similar allegations and seeking payoffs in exchange for retraction” (((REDACTED BY EDITOR DUE TO ABUSE OF WEBSITE)))"

Ed Magedon of the Rip Off Report also edited and redacted pages and pages of Crystal Cox's rip off report and removed the words "Marc Randazza" and "Randazza Legal Group", from pages of pages of the report. Now the Report makes no sense and is a muddled mess.

It is well known that Ed Magedon of the Rip Off Report NEVER removes Rip Off Reports, however in this report he did worse. He changed, manipulated and thereby falsified the entire report. Ed Magedson of the Rip Off Report clearly, deliberately chilled the speech of Crystal Cox and violated her First Amendment rights in favor or an alleged Free Speech advocate Marc Randazza of whom Crystal Cox was truthfully reporting on.

It is a well known, highly publicized fact that I, Crystal Cox won my Ninth Circuit appeal and that this Landmark Ruling took away the long standing monopoly of Free Speech in which Big Media and institutionalized press have had. And now all bloggers have equal rights to that of the biggest, richest media journalists and reporters out there.

For Ed Magedson of the Rip Off Report to intentionally paint me, Crystal Cox in false light and deliberately defame me, in order to aid and abet Marc Randazza's harassment and defamatory campaign against me, his former client, is highly unethical, is possibly illegal, is certainly discriminating and I allege is part of the Criminal Defamation of Marc Randazza, Kenneth White, Randazza Legal Group, NPR, Forbes, the New York Times, and many legal bloggers and other co-conspirators that have worked with and aided and abetted Marc Randazza in what I allege to be Criminal Defamation as per,

Here is a former blog post of what the Rip Off Report use to Look Like (PDF coming soon)

Here is what Crystal Cox's Rip Off Report about Marc Randazza and Randazza Legal Group looked like AFTER Ed Magedson REDACTED it. And check out the title, even THOUGH the whole world knows that I WON my Ninth Circuit MAJOR Free Speech Case.

Here is it what Crystal Cox's Rip Off Report about Marc Randazza and Randazza Legal Group looked like AFTER I, Crystal Cox, emailed Ed Magedson and asked him why he was flat out LYING about my Ninth Circuit Appeal Case.

Crystal Cox was NEVER on Trial for Extortion, never had a complaint filed for extortion.

Crystal Cox reports on corruption to the best of her ability and provides documented proof, to the best of her ability.

Crystal Cox has no history of extortion, and never received money to remove anything. The New York Times said she did, and Ninth Circuit judges used that as evidence, though hearsay.

Check Out Crystal Cox's appeal of what the Ninth Circuit judges said;

The email that Randazza painted to the world as extortion in the Crystal Cox Free Speech case, was a settlement negotiation. It was CLEARLY sent after Crystal Cox was sued, and had NOTHING to do with why she was sued.

Ed Magedson of the Rip Off Report is favoring corrupt, unlawful, unethical, and unconstitutional attorneys. And discriminating against law abiding, ethical, anti-corruption bloggers who are trying to help victims of that corruption.

Ed Magedson of the Rip Off Report has a true history of making money from people posting on his site and from removing those posts. Crystal Cox, me, has never engaged in extortion, never been investigated for extortion and does NOT have a history of posting online and asking money for a retraction, PERIOD. It NEVER EVER happened. Ed Magedson does not respect facts, he simply jumps on the bandwagon of Marc Randazza and aids and abets those who really are acting outside of law, ethics and our constitutional rights.

The Randazza Legal Groupies still ROAR about me being an extortionist, attacking an infant and all manner of defamatory, retaliating, hateful nonesense. However, the FACTS are ALL out there and the TRUTH remains to be the TRUTH. As I, Crystal Cox, having been reporting for nearly a decade now. Believe what makes you sleep best at night. Still the TRUTH is the TRUTH. 

Research Link on Exhibits

Thursday, June 4, 2015

Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group SPREAD Malicious Lies about his Former Client Crystal Cox He did so as an officer of the court and with full knowledge that what he was stating was FALSE.

Exhibit 22 CLEARLY shows that Marc Randazza knew Crystal Cox had not extorted him but had only asked for a job, yet he clearly, willfully, wanton, and with full knowledge of the facts and that what he was saying, spreading was false Spread malicious defamation to the world and committed FRAUD on the courts.

For more on this, Click Below

Marc Randazza FLAT out lied to the courts and the world about his representation or shall I say mis-representation and defamation against his former client Crystal Cox, me.

Exhibit 1 Below shows that Eugene Volokh, attorney and UCLA Law Professor ,clearly thought that attorney Marc Randazza was Crystal Cox’s attorney. Yet Randazza LIED to the world and committed fraud on the courts.

Click Below for More.

Exhibit 21 shows that Marc respect Cox, apologized if I felt not treated well and said that "People like you are important for the future of citizen journalism, and I wish to see you succeed."; Does Marc Randazza not owe his clients duty, obligations and to NOT violate their civil and constitutional rights?

Marc Randazza, apologized to me, Crystal Cox and said that people like me were important.  Marc Randazza claimed to want to see me succeed. Then he launched a massive online hate and defamation campaign against me, ruined my life, family connections, business, and quality of life. Exhibit 21 shows more on this, Click Below


"Exhibit 21 shows that Marc respect Cox, apologized if I felt not treated well and said that
"People like you are important for the future of citizen journalism, and I wish to see you succeed."

It shows he lied about representation. and admits to trying to broker a deal on Cox's behalf, which is the very definition of "representation.  Exhibit 21 shows Randazza saying, "I did tell the opposing counsel that I thought a deal might be brokered".

Exhibit 21 shows Randazza saying, "Despite the contents of this email, I wish to let you know that I am sill willing to lend a hand in any way - even in the background."

Cox took her former client, who claimed to humbly respect her, apologize, say people like her were need, at his word. Cox truly believed that Randazza was sincere in letting him know if he could help, even in the background. Cox had lost her home to foreclosure, lost her income and needed a job, this was the help she needed. She simply asked Randazza if he knew anyone or would hire Cox for PR work and yet he maliciously, deliberately and knowing the truth painted to the world that Cox had extorted him.  Knowing full well that he did not believe this, he simply want to teach Cox a lesson, intimidate her and ruin her life.

In which he succeeded. He convinced the world Cox was a criminal who had attacked his infant daughter. This ruined Cox's family relationships, business, friendships, ability to rent a home and has left Cox desolate, homeless and unable to rent, to work or to secure clients.

As all exhibits show, Marc Randazza was acting as my attorney. He worked with others in this representation such as Eugene Volokh and the opposition David Aman.

Cox would have kept Randazza on with Volokh had he not lied to her, berated her, presented deals to the opposition without her permission or knowledge of what they were, in her, then, 2.5 million dollar judgment.

Randazza retaliated against his former client, and Exhibit 21 proves that he did so with intent, maliciously and after claiming, offering to be of any kind of help.

Cox moves this court to include Exhibit 21 as evidence against Marc Randazza in her counterclaim.

Crystal L. Cox, Pro Se
Counter Plaintiff / Defendant"

Declaration of Facts, Filed by Crystal Cox in the Randazza v. Cox Case

Marc Randazza, Nevada Attorney, represented a blogger then ganged up with big and small media, forensics investigators, courts, judges, attorneys and more to maliciously defame her and ruin her life. Below is Crystal Cox's Declaration of Facts in this case.

Click Below to Read Full Document